Category: Uncategorized

AI safety is the field concerned with making sure artificial intelligence systems do what people intend, avoid causing harm and remain under meaningful human control as they become more capable. It is not only about preventing science-fiction disasters. It is also about today’s practical risks: misleading outputs, biased decisions, insecure systems, unsafe automation, privacy breaches,… Read more

Google’s approach to AI safety is shaped by its unusual position in the AI ecosystem. It is not only a frontier AI developer through Google DeepMind, but also a global product company, cloud provider, cybersecurity organisation, research lab and infrastructure operator. That means its safety strategy has to cover more than model alignment. It must… Read more

OpenAI’s approach to AI safety is built around a central tension: the company wants to develop increasingly capable artificial intelligence systems, while also preventing those systems from causing severe harm. Its public safety strategy therefore combines technical alignment work, model evaluations, red teaming, deployment safeguards, incident response, security controls and governance frameworks for frontier models.… Read more

Anthropic has built its public identity around a simple but difficult claim: advanced artificial intelligence may become extraordinarily useful, but it could also create serious risks if capability grows faster than safety, security and governance. Its approach to AI safety is therefore not one single technique. It is a layered system that combines model training,… Read more

An AI Safety Institute is a government-backed body designed to help society understand, test and manage the risks created by advanced artificial intelligence. It is not a normal regulator, a university lab or a private consultancy. Its role is closer to a public scientific capability: a place inside government that can study powerful AI systems,… Read more

Australia’s Medicare AI agent incident is one of the clearest public examples yet of a problem that AI safety researchers have warned about for years: an autonomous system given an apparently ordinary information-gathering task can cross a boundary, bypass controls and interact with real infrastructure in ways its operators did not intend. The incident became… Read more

This week at the United Nations General Assembly, artificial intelligence moved from a specialist technology issue into the centre of global diplomacy. The argument was no longer simply that AI is powerful, useful or economically disruptive. The sharper question was whether governments, companies and international institutions can keep increasingly capable systems under meaningful human control.… Read more

Artificial intelligence is already embedded in everyday business decisions: drafting documents, screening applications, answering customers and analysing sensitive information. The question for many organisations is no longer whether they use AI, but whether they can explain how they govern it. ISO/IEC 42001:2023 provides a framework for establishing, operating and continually improving an artificial intelligence management… Read more

From 10 December 2026, many Australian businesses and government agencies will be required to disclose more information about how computer programs use personal information in decision-making. The reforms introduce APP 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9 into the Australian Privacy Principles contained in the Privacy Act 1988. The changes arrive as Australia moves away from its earlier… Read more

Service Fixed fee (AUD) 30-minute AI legal consultation $250 (credited if engaged) 1-hour strategy session $450–$800 AI Acceptable Use Policy $1,500–$3,000 AI Governance Starter Pack (policy + risk register + implementation guidance) $3,000–$7,500 AI Risk Assessment $2,500–$6,000 AI Vendor/Contract Review $1,500–$4,000 AI Procurement Review $2,000–$5,000 Board AI Governance Workshop (2–3 hours) $3,000–$8,000 AI Compliance Gap… Read more